SAFETY ENGINE
Every plan — no exceptions — passes through binding safety floors before it reaches a signature. This page describes the actual numbers, because a safety claim without numbers is a slogan.
THE FLOORS, WITH THEIR VALUES
- PTA — percent tissue altered,[1] ceiling dependent on Kmax: 40% when Kmax ≥ 46 D, 45% below; binding in the LASIK family, informational (with honest labelling) in procedures where the threshold was never validated
- RSB — residual stromal bed:[2] 300 µm for LASIK/iLASIK/Q-LASIK; 280 µm for lenticule procedures with a 470 µm pre-op minimum; graded 300–350 µm for surface ablation depending on biomechanical evidence
- RCT — residual corneal thickness ≥ 400 µm, controlled independently: no flap choice can repair it, only reducing ablation can
- Post-op K window (Min–Max K) — a pass/fail test, from which each cornea's maximum treatable correction is computed
- Age & stability — 18 minimum (18–21 flagged for surgeon's discretion), 12-month refractive stability, medication and chronic-disease screening on every case
DISCIPLINE IN THE COUNTING
Ectasia indices are counted with correlation awareness — derived indices never masquerade as independent evidence. Missing data is never assumed normal; it is named in the report. Device floors are respected but never relied on when RLES AI's own floors are stricter: a laser that warns at 250 µm of stroma does not loosen a 300 µm rule.
WHAT THE ENGINE NEVER DOES
It never rules that surgery "cannot be done". It states which floor a plan violates and by how much, shows what parameter change would repair it, and offers the alternatives — a smaller zone, a different procedure, an ICL pathway. The verdict belongs to the surgeon; the engine's job is to make sure the verdict is informed.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
RLES AI runs as a mobile interface on your phone — nothing to install from a store, reports in minutes. The final clinical decision always rests with the surgeon.
Request Information
- Santhiago MR et al. Association between the percent tissue altered and post-LASIK ectasia. Am J Ophthalmol 2014;158:87-95. PMID: 24992564
- Randleman JB et al. Risk assessment for ectasia after corneal refractive surgery. Ophthalmology 2008;115:37-50. PMID: 18083221