HomeFeatures › Safety Engine
Built-In Protection

SAFETY ENGINE

Written by the RLES AI clinical rules team · Medically reviewed by the RLES AI Medical Advisory Board · Last updated: 17 August 2026

Every plan — no exceptions — passes through binding safety floors before it reaches a signature. This page describes the actual numbers, because a safety claim without numbers is a slogan.

THE FLOORS, WITH THEIR VALUES

  • PTA — percent tissue altered,[1] ceiling dependent on Kmax: 40% when Kmax ≥ 46 D, 45% below; binding in the LASIK family, informational (with honest labelling) in procedures where the threshold was never validated
  • RSB — residual stromal bed:[2] 300 µm for LASIK/iLASIK/Q-LASIK; 280 µm for lenticule procedures with a 470 µm pre-op minimum; graded 300–350 µm for surface ablation depending on biomechanical evidence
  • RCT — residual corneal thickness ≥ 400 µm, controlled independently: no flap choice can repair it, only reducing ablation can
  • Post-op K window (Min–Max K) — a pass/fail test, from which each cornea's maximum treatable correction is computed
  • Age & stability — 18 minimum (18–21 flagged for surgeon's discretion), 12-month refractive stability, medication and chronic-disease screening on every case

DISCIPLINE IN THE COUNTING

Ectasia indices are counted with correlation awareness — derived indices never masquerade as independent evidence. Missing data is never assumed normal; it is named in the report. Device floors are respected but never relied on when RLES AI's own floors are stricter: a laser that warns at 250 µm of stroma does not loosen a 300 µm rule.

WHAT THE ENGINE NEVER DOES

It never rules that surgery "cannot be done". It states which floor a plan violates and by how much, shows what parameter change would repair it, and offers the alternatives — a smaller zone, a different procedure, an ICL pathway. The verdict belongs to the surgeon; the engine's job is to make sure the verdict is informed.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

What are the safety floors?
Independent minimums per procedure family: percent tissue altered with a Kmax-dependent ceiling, residual stromal bed, residual corneal thickness, and a binding Min–Max K post-operative keratometry window.
Can RLES AI declare that surgery “cannot be done”?
No. It states that a specific plan violates a specific floor and shows what would have to change; the judgment about the patient always remains the surgeon’s.
SEE IT ON YOUR OWN CASES.
RLES AI runs as a mobile interface on your phone — nothing to install from a store, reports in minutes. The final clinical decision always rests with the surgeon.

Request Information
References — peer-reviewed sources
  1. Santhiago MR et al. Association between the percent tissue altered and post-LASIK ectasia. Am J Ophthalmol 2014;158:87-95. PMID: 24992564
  2. Randleman JB et al. Risk assessment for ectasia after corneal refractive surgery. Ophthalmology 2008;115:37-50. PMID: 18083221
Sources open on PubMed in a new tab.