YOUR RESULTS ARE DATA. MAKE THEM WORK FOR YOU.

Every surgeon drifts slightly from the population nomogram — the question is whether that drift is measured or imagined. RLES AI turns one-line follow-up entries into a personal outcome registry, and proposes corrections only when the statistics allow it.

RECORDING THAT TAKES TEN SECONDS

A follow-up is one message: patient, interval, UDVA, manifest, IOP, complaints. From these the registry accumulates the standard refractive outcome set — efficacy index, safety index, predictability within ±0.50/±1.00 D — and on every astigmatic case the full Alpins vector analysis:^[1] TIA, SIA, difference vector, correction index and index of success (with negligible-cylinder cases properly excluded so ratios don't explode).

A NOMOGRAM PROPOSAL YOU CAN DEFEND IN A MEETING

• No fixed case threshold — an adjustment of 0.25 D is proposed only when the 95% confidence interval of your mean error narrows below half that step (typically ~30 cases; fewer if your scatter is tight)
• Below the gate, the report says "data accumulating" or "trend — not actionable" and tells you how many cases remain
• A rolling 50-case window catches device aging and technique drift; subgroups (procedure, correction range, cylinder) each fill their own gate
• Proposals are never applied automatically — the nomogram remains the surgeon’s

REAL-WORLD EVIDENCE, READY WHEN YOU NEED IT

On request the registry prints a standard six-graph outcome report^[2] — cumulative UDVA, efficacy, safety, predictability scatter, error histogram with confidence interval, and the vector plot — the same format journals and congresses expect.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS