HomeFeatures › PTA Calculator
Free Tool

PERCENT TISSUE ALTERED CALCULATOR

Written by the RLES AI clinical rules team · Last updated: 7 September 2026

PTA is the percentage of corneal thickness removed or cut through in a laser procedure: flap or cap plus ablation, divided by the thinnest pre-operative pachymetry. Enter four values below; the calculation runs in your browser.

PTA CALCULATOR

Percent tissue altered
Ceiling for this Kmax
Residual stromal bed
Residual corneal thickness

Nothing is stored or transmitted — the calculation runs entirely in your browser. For professional use by eye surgeons; it is not a diagnosis and does not decide whether surgery may be performed. One number is not a plan: RLES AI audits about 300 items in a single laser case. See what one plan actually requires →

WHY THE CEILING IS NOT A SINGLE NUMBER

The commonly quoted 40% threshold comes from eyes with normal pre-operative topography, where percent tissue altered ≥40% was present in 97% of eyes that went on to develop ectasia, with an odds ratio of 223 — far stronger than any other single variable in that series.[1] RLES AI applies the ceiling as a function of corneal steepness: 40% when Kmax is 46 D or above, 45% below it. A steeper cornea gets the tighter limit.

The threshold was derived and validated in LASIK. In lenticule extraction and surface ablation, PTA is calculated and reported but is not treated as a pass/fail test, because no validated threshold exists for those procedures; there, the residual stromal bed and residual corneal thickness floors decide.

WHAT PTA DOES NOT TELL YOU

PTA is one of three independent columns. Residual corneal thickness is controlled separately, and it behaves differently: it equals pachymetry minus ablation, so it is independent of flap thickness. Thinning the flap improves PTA and the residual bed but leaves RCT untouched — only reducing ablation repairs an RCT violation. Abnormal topography, residual bed thickness, age and pre-operative corneal thickness are all part of published ectasia risk models,[2] and none of them appears in a PTA figure.

FROM ONE NUMBER TO A PLAN

This page computes one value. A signature-ready plan tests roughly 300 items for the same eye — refraction, topographic and tomographic indices, biomechanics, device nomogram rows, hinge geometry, the post-operative keratometry window, medication and chronic-disease screening — and names every item that was not reported. See the full data set and the evidence behind it.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

How is percent tissue altered calculated?
PTA = (flap or cap thickness + ablation depth) ÷ thinnest pre-operative pachymetry, expressed as a percentage. In surface ablation the epithelium is included in the conservative form of the calculation.
What is a safe PTA value?
RLES AI applies a Kmax-dependent ceiling: 40% when Kmax is 46 D or above, 45% below it, binding in the LASIK family. Values within 5 points of the ceiling are treated as a borderline band. The threshold is validated for LASIK, not for lenticule or surface procedures.
Does a thinner flap fix a high PTA?
It lowers PTA and raises the residual stromal bed, but it does not change residual corneal thickness, which equals pachymetry minus ablation. If RCT is the violated floor, only reducing ablation — a smaller optical zone or less correction — repairs it.
Is this calculator a medical device?
No. It performs a published arithmetic formula in your browser, stores nothing and transmits nothing. It is for professional use by eye surgeons, does not diagnose, and does not decide whether surgery may be performed.
SEE IT ON YOUR OWN CASES.
RLES AI runs as a mobile interface on your phone — nothing to install from a store, reports in minutes. The final clinical decision always rests with the surgeon.

Request Information
References — peer-reviewed sources
  1. Santhiago MR, Smadja D, Gomes BF et al. Association between the percent tissue altered and post-LASIK ectasia in eyes with normal preoperative topography. Am J Ophthalmol 2014;158:87-95. PMID: 24727263
  2. Randleman JB, Woodward M, Lynn MJ, Stulting RD. Risk assessment for ectasia after corneal refractive surgery. Ophthalmology 2008;115:37-50. PMID: 17624434
Sources open on PubMed in a new tab.