HomeFeatures › RSB / RCT Calculator
Free Tool

RESIDUAL STROMAL BED & RCT CALCULATOR

Written by the RLES AI clinical rules team · Last updated: 7 September 2026

Enter refraction, optical zone, pachymetry and flap thickness. The tool derives central ablation depth from measured ablation-per-diopter tables, then applies the floors that belong to the selected procedure family.

RSB / RCT CALCULATOR

Central ablation
Residual stromal bed
Residual corneal thickness
Floors for this procedure

Nothing is stored or transmitted — the calculation runs entirely in your browser. For professional use by eye surgeons; it is not a diagnosis and does not decide whether surgery may be performed. One number is not a plan: RLES AI audits about 300 items in a single laser case. See what one plan actually requires →

THE FLOORS ARE PROCEDURE-SPECIFIC

  • LASIK / iLASIK / Q-LASIK — residual stromal bed ≥ 300 µm, residual corneal thickness ≥ 400 µm
  • SMILE / SILK — bed ≥ 280 µm with a 470 µm pre-operative pachymetry minimum; the 280 µm figure is only reachable with a 120 µm cap, because the 400 µm RCT floor becomes binding with thinner caps
  • PRK / T-PRK — a 50 µm epithelium is counted; the bed floor is graded, 300 µm only when biomechanical indices are measured and normal, otherwise 330–350 µm

In the published case-control series of post-LASIK ectasia, 70% of affected eyes had a residual bed below 250 µm, and the mean bed in ectasia cases was 223 µm against 294 µm in controls.[1] Residual bed thickness is one of the weighted variables in the ectasia risk score.[2]

WHERE THE ABLATION DEPTH COMES FROM

Depth is not taken from Munnerlyn alone. RLES AI uses measured ablation-per-diopter values — 12.0 µm/D at a 6.0 mm optical zone, 15.0 at 6.5 and 17.8 at 7.0 — interpolating between them and falling back to Munnerlyn below 6.0 mm, where the two agree exactly.[3] Central depth also depends on the refractive mode: in hyperopic treatment central ablation is zero because tissue is removed in the periphery, and in mixed astigmatism only the cylindrical component is ablated centrally.

THIS IS THE GEOMETRY, NOT THE DECISION

Two floors holding does not make an eye a candidate. The same case still needs ectasia screening, the post-operative keratometry window, the device's own nomogram, tear-film and warpage checks, and a medication and chronic-disease history. See the full data set behind a single case.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

What is the minimum residual stromal bed?
RLES AI applies 300 µm for the LASIK family, 280 µm for lenticule procedures with a 470 µm pre-operative pachymetry minimum, and a graded 300–350 µm for surface ablation depending on whether biomechanical indices were measured and normal.
What is the difference between RSB and RCT?
Residual stromal bed is pachymetry minus flap or cap minus ablation. Residual corneal thickness is pachymetry minus ablation only — the layer above the bed is replaced. RCT is therefore independent of flap thickness and cannot be repaired by a thinner flap.
How much tissue does one diopter remove?
At a 6.0 mm optical zone approximately 12 µm per diopter, at 6.5 mm approximately 15 µm, at 7.0 mm approximately 17.8 µm. The measured values sit above the Munnerlyn estimate at wider zones, and the gap grows with the fourth power of the zone diameter.
Does the calculator apply to SMILE?
Yes — select the lenticule option. The lenticule replaces the ablation term and the cap replaces the flap; the 280 µm bed floor and the 470 µm pre-operative minimum are applied.
SEE IT ON YOUR OWN CASES.
RLES AI runs as a mobile interface on your phone — nothing to install from a store, reports in minutes. The final clinical decision always rests with the surgeon.

Request Information
References — peer-reviewed sources
  1. Randleman JB, Russell B, Ward MA, Thompson KP, Stulting RD. Risk factors and prognosis for corneal ectasia after LASIK. Ophthalmology 2003;110:267-75. PMID: 12578766
  2. Randleman JB, Woodward M, Lynn MJ, Stulting RD. Risk assessment for ectasia after corneal refractive surgery. Ophthalmology 2008;115:37-50. PMID: 17624434
  3. Munnerlyn CR, Koons SJ, Marshall J. Photorefractive keratectomy: a technique for laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 1988;14:46-52. PMID: 3339547
Sources open on PubMed in a new tab.