HomeFeatures › Complication Analysis
Before and After the OR

PREVENT WHAT YOU CAN. UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU COULDN’T.

Written by the RLES AI clinical rules team · Medically reviewed by Hüseyin Cengiz, MD · Alim Hüseynov, MD · Last updated: 20 August 2026

Many complications leave their traces before the laser fires — in the geometry, the history or the device settings. RLES AI hunts their preconditions at the planning stage, and when an adverse event does occur, investigates it with the discipline of an incident analysis, not the reflex of blame.

PREVENTION: THE PRECONDITION HUNT

  • Hinge ramp calculation — the ΔK between the steep axis and the hinge site converted to microns; hinges thinner than the safety floor are flagged before a free flap can happen[1]
  • Buttonhole geometry, keratome kinematics (linear vs rotational cutting heads behave differently)[2], and the topical-anaesthetic rule that prevents epithelial slides mimicking buttonholes[3]
  • Narrow-angle screening on every preop topography, medication anamnesis (isotretinoin, amiodarone, topiramate) and chronic-disease query on every case

ANALYSIS: A CONFIDENTIAL IN-CLINIC INSTRUMENT

When something goes wrong, the complication module runs a structured investigation: an atlas of 45+ entities across six families, mimic tables (what looks like a buttonhole but is not), a four-grade severity score, and root-cause categories that explicitly include device condition, calibration history, blade lots and theatre environment. The report is an internal-use document built on just-culture principles — process analysis, not person analysis — and closes with preventive actions, including revised nomogram values for a future second procedure where appropriate.

THE QUESTIONS COME BEFORE THE VERDICT

The module generates a neutral, complication-specific question set — which keratome, which settings, when was the last calibration, what did the interface look like — and the report is not written until the questions and imaging are complete. Understanding first; conclusions after.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

What is the complication report for?
It is an internal clinic document — a structured, blame-free root-cause analysis designed to prevent recurrence, covering surgical, device, environmental and patient-compliance factors.
Does it give real-time guidance during an acute complication?
No. The module is retrospective by design; time-critical intraoperative decisions belong to the surgeon.
SEE IT ON YOUR OWN CASES.
RLES AI runs as a mobile interface on your phone — nothing to install from a store, reports in minutes. The final clinical decision always rests with the surgeon.

Request Information
References — peer-reviewed sources
  1. Jacobs JM, Taravella MJ. Incidence of intraoperative flap complications in laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28(1):23-8. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01097-5 PMID: 11777706
  2. Al-Mezaine HS, Al-Amro SA, Al-Obeidan S. Intraoperative flap complications in laser in situ keratomileusis with two types of microkeratomes. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2011;25(3):239-43. doi:10.1016/j.sjopt.2011.04.002 PMID: 23960931
  3. Tekwani NH, Huang D. Risk factors for intraoperative epithelial defect in laser in-situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134(3):311-6. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01597-0 PMID: 12208241
Sources open on PubMed in a new tab.